The majority of claimants look forward to prepare an SR&ED tax credit without the help of a professional consultant. This action is oftentimes encouraged by numerous CRA’s Research Technology Advisors (RTAs). If you want to learn more about the pros and cons of DIY SE&ED business fund, you may want to be more knowledgeable of the following facts before making your final decision:
The Advantages When DIY SR&ED
-You can obtain more funds for innovation; The fact that there are no consultant fees involved in a DIY SR&ED grant is one of the main advantages. This allows you to save up to 25% of the entire of the cash refund, considering that numerous Small to Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) depend on services based on contingency. You will not only be able to cut down your expenses on innovation, but you will also be able to invest in your products. The fees may vary between 10% to 50% of your total cash refund.
-Each individual can learn more about SR&ED Tax Credits; This fact is guaranteed especially when you are accomplishing your SR&ED preparation in-house. For example, an in-house engineer may be more familiar in the field compared to a consultant, even though the consultant has the ability to place large amount of information into but only the important elements required by the SRED.
-A DIY filing is encouraged even by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA); Numerous public policy consultations have been performed on this program. Simplifying the application process and assuring that the main principles involved in the program remain the same would be the main goal of these changes. The need for SR&ED consultancy may be considerably reduced if the documentation and application forms are simplified.
However, every individual that wants to do a DIY R&D Tax Credits should recognize the possible risks of nonprofessional claim preparation.
The Disadvantages When DIY SR&ED
-The requirements and forms may fluctuate from time to time; The efforts performed to simplify and strengthen the DIY SR&ED program feature numerous problems, even though they were all conducted with the best intentions. Some tax services may include more conflicts than even before, while we can also find more letters to the minister and more claim appeals. The numerous doubts surrounding the CRA make it harder for individuals to claim with certainty, even though there are numerous sincere attempts to improve the program.
-You need to possess some unique skills; In order to avoid a really expensive claim review, a claimant should be aware of all the unexpected and subtle bits of knowledge involved in the preparation process. While some activities can be covered by the claimant perfectly, others may need to be accomplished by the preparers. Outlining their technology, gathering info pertinent to create a write-up, describe the SR&ED work performed, and so on, as activities that should make more sense for a claimant. Even though they are passionate about the technology, the vast majority of CTOs face serious problems when it comes to filling out forms. Preparers are really great at creating technical narrative form since they use their knowledge of the political and administration fluctuations of the program. Combining these two in a cost-effective way may worth the effort.
-Canada Revenue Agency will never describe what is acceptable in advance, even if you bring strong evidence; Providing supporting evidence to CRA may be really difficult for most claimants, since CRA does not clearly define what is considered acceptable documentation. Since the rules in a PCRP are non-binding to either part, numerous Revenue Canada reviewers are reluctant to offer clear answers regarding a possible solution. Identifying some problems in the documentation and offering tips on how to correct these problems before a review are two tasks that should be performed by an experienced preparer.
-You will get no help if you are reviewed; The easiest part of the whole process is creating a submission. Life is good if the submission goes through without a review. Each segment fragment in the event of a review will be justified if you submission goes through. It is in this part of the process where most claims are being totally denied. It may be ineligible until proven the contrary with some reviewers. In some cases, several questions may not even make sense at all, but you will still have to answer them. Even groups are being denied in full, but they are often bigger organization. Only the SMEs will encounter serious difficulties in case they are selected for a review.
For a 30Mins free no obligation consulting service contact us.